Use CurrentWare's Web Filtering and Employee Monitoring software to secure your network and enhance employee productivity. Block Internet Access. Our experts have reviewed the best internet filter software for 2016. See up-to-date comparisons on features and the best prices for the top rated programs. Internet censorship in Australia currently consists of a regulatory regime under which the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to.
Internet Content Filtering and Blocking. Internet Content Filtering and Blocking. Last Updated: 1. 1 May 2. We owe it to our children to improve the filter between their ears that will help them know whom to trust, how to click the . Internet safety education is key to this, and should be mandated, not filtering. In 1. 99. 9 it was politicians within the Federal Coalition Government, in early 2. The Australia Institute, in late 2. Family First Party, in late 2. In early 2. 00. 6 the Federal Labor Party (ALP) announced that they would implement mandatory ISP- filtering if elected. EFA shares the view recently expressed by world- renowned child online safety expert, Parry Aftab (regarding the to- date unenforceable USA Child Online Protection Act 1. They work, and they have been working for the last five or six years,' Aftab said. EFA does not endorse the use of filtering software because it may result in a false sense of security and/or unduly restrict young people's internet access due to over- blocking etc. Nevertheless, EFA considers that parents who wish to have technological assistance in protecting their children should install filtering software and configure it to suit their family's needs, rather than demand the government mandate a one- size- fits- all ISP filtering system. Alternatively, or in addition, ISPs may choose to offer optional server- based filtering. The Code applies to all Australian ISPs and the ACMA has powers to enforce compliance. Further information is available on the ACMA's page about the Internet Content Codes and the IIA's Guide for Users. As stated in the IIA Guide for Users: . These include effectiveness, ease of use, configurability, availability of support and agreement by the filter company providing the filter to update the filter as required by ACMA, for example where ACMA determines following a complaint, that a specified site is prohibited under Australian law. As stated in the IIA Guide for ISPs. This does not require joining the IIA, although IIA member ISPs are able to participate in the program at no cost. Family Friendly ISPs are authorised to display the Ladybird Logo which signifies adherence to best practice standards. These details are presented for information purposes. EFA endorsement of suitability. Products on the list have been on it since at least 2. April 2. 00. 6). The most recent test results were published by the ACMA in March 2. Effectiveness of Internet Filtering Software Products . However, new versions of most filters have been released since then. The links below are to the makers' sites. More information about this product is provided in the section titled PC- based Filter Products with Server- Based Filtering later herein. According to their web site, the Content Protect product . As Web pages are requested, Content. Protect's dynamic analyzing engine has the ability to understand content in context and filter appropriately. Based on the user's filter settings, content is either filtered or blocked. The product was highly rated by Web. User Magazine in July 2. No. 1 by the 2. 00. Internet Filter Report site. Check the relevant site for details. Macintosh version planned for late 2. Blue Coat Systems, California, USA. More information about this product is provided in the section titled PC- based Filter Products with Server- Based Filtering later herein. Using We- Blocker, 'We' as a community can provide a safe Internet for everyone. It will only go to the hand picked web sites programmed into the Web Browser. The rest of the internet & WWW, along with its many safety concerns and hazards.. No. Worrys works with Internet Explorer, and comes populated with a Trust. File of over 1. 00. Kid. Safe sites recommended by the American Library Association (ALA). IF a requested site (URL) is not in No. Worrys' Trust. File, then kids cannot get there. Parent/Administrator can navigate anywhere, and can update the Trust. File via a password protected Login. It is a private- label version of the filter made by 8e. Technologies. As detailed on the web site of Responsible Netizen Institute (at the Center for Advanced Technology in Education, University of Oregon), 8e. Technologies, formerly X- Stop/Log- on Data Corporation, is a company that appears to have been started in some form of partnership with the American Family Association. Safe Eyes 2. 00. 6 (Windows and Mac OS 1. US$4. 9. 9. 5 per year. The filter maker, Safe. Browse. com, Inc, is based in Georgia USA and was founded in 1. Information in media releases on the site indicates that the Safe Eyes filter became available in 2. Safe. Browse state that they use . Safe. Browse also states: . Our blazing fast categorization system determines the content category of each website you visit, and compares the category with your preferences to determine if the site should be blocked. This means that you never have to download any 'Site Lists' to keep Safe Eyes up- to- date. The product was PC Magazine . Macintosh version planned for late 2. Free for home use. The filter maker, Blue Coat Systems, is based in California USA. K9 Web Protection blocks more than 5. It enables parents to monitor and control what sites their children access, and enables them to block questionable sites, including the popular website My. Space. According to Blue Coat's site, if a user tries to go to a Web site that the database hasn't seen before, it scans the content of the site for inappropriate material, and then either permits or prohibits the site (Blue Coat call this process DRTR Dynamic Real- Time Rating). Blue Coat claim that . The engine that powers K9 is designed for commercial customers, who, quite naturally, don't want their employees to become non- productive because of a mistake in their filtering solution. So we've taken great care to not over- block. For example, K9 will allow you to access breast cancer sites, while blocking nudity or pornography. K9 will allow access to drug treatment and information sites, while blocking access to sites that promote or glamorize illegal drug use. The engine that K9 uses to decide which Web sites are inappropriate for children is more sophisticated than many other programs. They may be installed on an ISP's or other company's server. The server- based filters below are included on IIA's . Note: N2. H2 has been acquired by Secure Computing and since October 2. N2. H2 Bess' filter has ceased to be available for sale. It has been combined with Smart. Filter to become Secure Computing's 'Smart. Filter, Bess Edition'. EFA has not conducted an exhaustive search to find filtered ISPs. From the list of blocking categories on Webshield's site (in April 2. X- Stop) as the descriptions of blocking categories are the same. According to a page on the Lismore Christadelphians' 'Explore the Bible' web site (April 2. While some of the above services appear to provide customisable levels/categories of filtering, the customisation apparently applies on an Internet access account basis, i. Also, they may not be suitable where one or more members wish to use P2. P technology. In the latter regard, for example, Webshield state on their web site that access to all content available using peer to peer (P2. P) technologies is blocked because . It is possible that all or many filtered ISPs also block access to P2. P networks without making that clear on their web site. Many PC- based (end- user) filters provide an option to block, or not block, access to P2. P and some enable this option to be set differently for each user of the PC (e. See later section for reviews and commentaries focussed on effectiveness/accuracy and under- and over- blocking issues. It was apparently available as a beta or trial version for some months previously. It's definitely the best free filter I've tried but it has one downside; in order to provide the filtering it uses Blue Coat's web servers which can slow down your browsing a tad. Subscriber Adi Lana wrote in tell me about another free parental filter called Naomi . I tried it out and it's quite impressive .. Modem users will however, appreciate Naomi's speed advantage. The list of sites blocked by each package is generally a closely- guarded secret and as such, parents have no option but to trust the judgement and stated policies of the commercial entities responsible. This is the danger. While some filter makers claim that a human reviews the automated categorisation, it would be physically impossible for humans, even a large group of humans, to review every page. Instead, the software uses artificial intelligence to automatically analyse every page in real time and either permit or deny access. This is particularly likely in products targeted at the fundamentalist Christian market. Whether or not this is a problem for end- users with different views depends on whether such content is included in blocking categories that the end- user can switch off, or whether it is lumped into a category such as . First is a listing of reports about multiple filter products, followed by a section listing reports about single filter products. Statement Regarding the Kaiser Family Foundation Study on How Filtering Affects Access to Health Information, Nancy Willard, M. S., J. D. Filtering companies and their conservative pro- filtering allies promise that filtering will protect young people on the Internet. This misrepresentation creates a dangerous level of false security and complacency. It is dangerous to believe that we can protect young people by establishing electronically fenced playpens. The snakes can still get in and teens can easily get out. Filtering software is not infallible, it does not protect against all concerns and it is not, and will never be, present on all computers that our young people will access. Filters are not the solution. They will never be the solution. The researchers also tested one product widely used in the home, AOL Parental Controls. The study examined both how easy the products were to install and use, and how effectively they filtered Internet content. Web Filtering – Cyberoam. Complete Visibility & Control over HTTP & HTTPSCyberoam’s award- winning Web Filtering offers one of the most comprehensive URL databases with millions of URLs grouped into 8. Available with the Cyberoam network security appliances (Next- Generation Firewalls/UTMs) and Cyberoam Wi- Fi Appliances range, it blocks access to harmful websites, preventing malware, phishing, pharming attacks and undesirable content that could lead to legal liability and direct financial losses. Cyberoam’s Layer 8 Identity- based policies offer granular web access controls, preventing data and productivity loss. Comprehensive web filter coupled with granular Layer 8 controls make Cyberoam Web Filtering the right choice for large enterprises and small organizations. Feature. Feature Description. Benefit. Web Categorization. On- cloud web categorization database. Web filter with 8. Web categories. Custom categories. Automatic updates through Web.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |